End! November 9, 2006
Posted by Shawna in General, House: Dist. 22.add a comment
The day of the election, TX-22 went to “toss-up” on the NYT’s web site. Hardly helpful. No fears, though: Lampson decimated Sekula-Gibbs. Honestly, I’m shocked Dems took the Senate, though I’m hardly going to complain. I don’t know how much the Foley thing helped that out, but I didn’t think it possible two months ago. While this is certainly a good thing in terms of a fresh perspective, the fact that Bush is being a dipstick already is not helpful. In a press conference, he stated that he had shaken up the leadership in the Pentagon, and since they were now the majority party, it was the responsibility of the Democrats to implement an effective Iraq policy. Wtflip! Nice way to try and squirm out of that one, George. It surprises me that he adamantly states that he thought the GOP would hold Congress. Yes, he’s a relentlessly optimistic, but Jesus Christ, you can’t say that you didn’t see your party losing 28 seats. That’s not even close, like 2 seats. Twenty-eight seats (which, for the record, is not equivalent to 30). The Senate he’s allowed to feel stunned about because, hell, even I can’t quite believe it–and Allen’s conceded and everything at this point. God only knows what the next two years will bring, but it’ll at least be new mistakes and not the same ones over and over.
Zogby Says… October 27, 2006
Posted by Shawna in General.add a comment
John Zogby (yes, the polling firm is actually named after someone) seems to think that the Reps have a chance at pulling this out. This article is from Monday (10/23), but is still pertinent. If the race were to be held today, Zogby predicts that Dems could “pick up 25-30 seats” in the House (where they only need 15 to be the majority) and “are within striking distance” of getting the number of seats (6) needed to take the Senate. Good news, right? Eh…
He sees two messages that might work in winning back voters to the GOP. “If the Republicans can get it back on message, it will be about terrorism, it won’t be about taxes,” Zogby said. Another winning message, especially with the Republican base, “is that they will have to go after the Democratic leadership and say do you really want Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi?” he says.
(Source: Christian Science Monitor, 10/23/06)
Yeeeeeah. That right there is potent to the headline-skimmer American. Wonder if the GOP will pick up on it in time. Though…in NY, they seem to be taking this whole Hevesi thing to town. Hmmm, hitting on teenagers, using taxpayer money to chauffeur disabled wife…right (and then eventually paying the money back). Those are really equivalent scandals, especially morally, boys. (cough *grasping at straws* cough cough)
Dancing With the Stars? October 14, 2006
Posted by Shawna in General, House: Dist. 22.add a comment
I was just thinking this morning how absolutely NOTHING has been happening in Texas, save the Democrats still being favored to win TX-22. But, no worries, leave it to Tom Delay, folks:
Tom DeLay’s Candidate Quicksteps Out of ‘Dancing’
Tom DeLay’s efforts to seize control of the voting on ABC’s hit reality series “Dancing With the Stars” came crashing down this week when his candidate, country crooner Sara Evans, abruptly quit the show and filed for divorce….
Shortly before the show debuted, DeLay sent out a blast e-mail, asking his supporters to vote for Evans on the dancing competition series because she had been a strong supporter of the Republican Party and “represents good American values in the media” while “ultra liberal talk show host Jerry Springer” does not.
(Source: Washington Post, 10/14/06)
Are you KIDDING me! Have you nothing better to do than to campaign for a stupid TV show!?! I guess that makes some degree of sense, since he sure as hell can’t help campaign for Sekula-Gibbs…
No Memory? September 27, 2006
Posted by Shawna in General.add a comment
The Times states today, in a very strongly worded headline: “Theme of Campaign Ads: Don’t Be Nice.” The article goes on to state the following:
The result of the dueling accusations has been what both sides described on Tuesday as the most toxic midterm campaign environment in memory.
(Source: NY Times, 9/27/06)
OK, so this may be the most toxic midterm ever, but there have been FAR far nastier presidential elections. When Jefferson and Hamilton were running against each other, Hamiltonians declared that the country would pretty much go to hell if Jefferson was elected, since he was a Godless man (note: the man was a deist, not to mention the fact that Jefferson and Hamilton HATED each other with the passion of a thousand suns). Republicans bashed squeaky clean Grover…Cleveland, of course, when they found out that he’d fathered a child out of wedlock. To Cleveland’s credit, he openly admitted it and promised to help support the child financially. That didn’t stop the political cartoons or the chants at all, but that was in frickin 1892! I don’t think we’ve messed with a candidate’s sexual life (aside from orientation, which seems to be another matter) since then…
Mini-Mudpie Flinging September 25, 2006
Posted by Shawna in General, House: Dist. 22.add a comment
Of course, I meant to post about this over the weekend, but, what can I say, I’m a college kid. Retention span of a goldfish. In any event, it seems our two favorite parties have started flinging crap back and forth again in court. It seems like they’ve realized that direct attacks on the other’s choice of car upholstery color isn’t quite as effective as drawing in the federal court system:
Texas Democrats File Suit Against Voting Fraud Law
HOUSTON, Sept. 22 — In the latest of the nation’s skirmishes over voting rights, Texas Democrats have sued two top Republican state officials over an antifraud law that the suit says is being used to intimidate minority voters casting ballots by mail.(Source: NY Times, 9/22/06)
Hmmmm. To me, making mail balloting seem so imposing almost seems like it hurts the Republicans more than you’d think. In my district (22), the only way to cast a vote in the Republican candidate’s favor is via write-in: i.e. mailing it in. The article goes on to say that the GOP are purportedly going after people more apt to vote Democrat (surprise?), but all the same–is it really wise to get this crap into the limelight about six weeks before the election? There are really two ways to view this, in the end:
- Extremely Stupid: Republicans have shot themselves in the foot by calling the public’s attention to the fallacies of write-in balloting. If they expect to win District 22 at all–remember that the Republicans have no one on the formal election day ballot due to DeLay’s crap, meaning that they MUST wage a write-in campaign to keep the seat from turning Democrat–pointing out the possibility of someone’s vote getting lost in the mail due to partisan crap, my guess would be that not many will do so. The write-in process is complicated enough for the “average American,” so pointing out that all that effort to get the ballot and complete it correctly all for naught is slightly moronic.
- Roveian Genius: By filing this suit, Democrats are taking a gamble. They have now brought the whole mailing-the-ballot thing out of the closet, which is a huge break for the Republicans. Even though this case is about falsifying the ballots, any press is good press for the Republicans. Believe me when I say that they’ve been stumping the whole “write in” thing in their cute, GOP way. As far as I know, they’ve yet to hand out stuffed elephants with a suitable slogan emblazoned on a 100-percent-cotton-made-in-America mini-elephant t-shirt, but it wouldn’t surprise me. The front page of Sekula-Gibbs’s webpage is all about how to write-in, and all her election paraphernalia has “write in” all over it. The people in the district, therefore, have been made *somewhat* aware. Frickin getting an article published in the Times is akin to shooting up a frickin HUGE red distress flare when you’re trying to ambush someone—the genie’s out of the bottle (note the metaphor, for those who are metaphorically challenged) in a big way. Not only is that entire constituency now aware of the write-in ballot, but so is the rest of Texas…and the rest of the country as well. The added publicity might just be what the Republicans need to mount a serious campaign to keep the seat. Congrats to the Democrats for aiding and abetting the
enemycompetition.
I’d like to end with this amusing paragraph from the article (for the record, I do not condone window surfing):
One plaintiff, Gloria Meeks, a 69-year-old Fort Worth woman who said she was being investigated for helping elderly and disabled voters cast ballots, provided a sworn statement saying two state investigators “peeped into my bathroom window not once but twice while I was in my bathroom drying off from my bath.”
What, were they expecting a smoke-filled bathroom with ballots piled sky high?